Current:Home > InvestCommittee advances bill to let Alabama inmates speak at parole hearings -ProsperityEdge
Committee advances bill to let Alabama inmates speak at parole hearings
View
Date:2025-04-13 13:53:18
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — A legislative committee on Thursday advanced a bill to allow state inmates, for the first time, to speak by phone or video conference at their parole hearings.
The House Judiciary Committee approved the bill after adding an amendment to give victims and law enforcement officials the option to also participate by electronic means instead of driving to Montgomery for the parole hearing.
The bill, which was approved in the Senate without a dissenting vote, now moves to the Alabama House of Representatives to be considered in the final three days of the legislative session.
Alabama is one of two states that do not allow inmates to speak at parole hearings.
“SB 312 gives the incarcerated inmate the ability to participate in the hearing and more importantly, it gives the Parole Board another opportunity or an opportunity to question that inmate,” Republican Sen. Will Barfoot, the bill sponsor, said.
The approval came after earlier disagreements over a proposal that would have weakened the bill by letting the Parole Board decide whether inmates could participate.
Wanda Miller, executive director of VOCAL, a victims advocacy group, said her organization opposes the bill because it believes the current system is adequate. Miller said victim advocacy groups had suggested the amendment to allow victims and law enforcement officials to also speak by phone or video conference.
Barfoot said that will make it easier for victims and law enforcement officials to participate in hearings instead of “driving sometimes three hours to sit through a 10- or 15-minute hearing.”
If approved, the measure would become effective on Oct. 1.
veryGood! (6533)
Related
- Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
- U.S. hits Apple with landmark antitrust suit, accusing tech giant of stifling competition
- Government funding deal includes ban on U.S. aid to UNRWA, a key relief agency in Gaza, until 2025, sources say
- Hayley Erbert Returns to Dance Studio With Derek Hough 3 Months After Skull Surgery
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- 1 of 17 bus companies sued by NYC agrees to temporarily stop transporting migrants, Mayor Adams says
- A small town suspended its entire police force. Residents want to know why
- Mom of Utah grief author accused of poisoning her husband also possibly involved in his death, affidavit says
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Colorado extends Boise State's March Madness misery. Can Buffs go on NCAA Tournament run?
Ranking
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- Manhunt underway after 3 Idaho corrections officers ambushed and shot while taking inmate out of medical center
- Manhunt underway after 3 Idaho corrections officers ambushed and shot while taking inmate out of medical center
- What is gambling addiction and how widespread is it in the US?
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- Alabama high court authorizes execution date for man convicted in 2004 slaying
- Kia recalls 48,232 EV6 hybrid vehicles: See if yours is on the list
- West Virginia man shot by 15-year-old son after firing weapon at wife
Recommendation
The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
Drake Bell defends former Nickelodeon co-star Josh Peck following Brian Peck allegations
Milwaukee's Summerfest 2024 headliners: Toosii joins lineup of Tyler Childers, Motley Crue
This Real Housewives of Beverly Hills Star Is Leaving After Season 13
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
Colorado extends Boise State's March Madness misery. Can Buffs go on NCAA Tournament run?
About 70 dogs killed after 'puppy mill' bursts into flames in Ohio, reports say
US wants to ban TikTok, but First Amendment demands stronger case on national security